RPA vs No-Code vs GPA: Who Actually Builds the Automation
Three ways a business process gets automated, and the question that actually separates them is not how the automation gets built. It's who owns it at 9am on the Monday it breaks.
Read →The people RPA forgot. The processes the CoE never reached. The 40% that's still manual.
Three ways a business process gets automated, and the question that actually separates them is not how the automation gets built. It's who owns it at 9am on the Monday it breaks.
Read →Every automation vendor repositioned to agentic in the last twenty-four months. The dates show it was mostly a category exercise, and the real cost was not the marketing spend. It was the audience the whole industry walked away from while it was busy renaming itself.
Read →The automation industry is arguing about two paradigms. Neither of them covers 50% of the work that actually needs automating.
Read →For two years Arjun did ten hours a day in finance ops. Then he found something. Four months later, 23 bots were running. He was not the same person anymore.
Read →RPA didn't fail because the technology was bad. It failed because the wrong person was in control. Cursor figured this out for software development. The same move is coming for process automation.
Read →The automation your CoE never got to. That's what GPA is for.
Read →